"…mais ce serait peut-être l'une des plus grandes opportunités manquées de notre époque si le logiciel libre ne libérait rien d'autre que du code…"

Archive for the ‘Git’ Category

Quelques liens sur le développement de pilotes USB sous GNU/Linux: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Daniel Drake, fprint, libusb, pylibusb, lsusb.py, LDD3

Posted by patrick sur mars 22, 2010

http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=&a=2009-01&t=6220842

FYI, this is a patch that will be sent out in the next round to Linus
for inclusion in 2.6.25.

If anyone has any objections about it, please let me know.

thanks,

greg k-h

--------

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Subject: USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

Over two years ago, the Linux USB developers stated that they believed
there was no way to create a USB kernel driver that was not under the
GPL.  This patch moves the USB apis to enforce that decision.

There are no known closed source USB drivers in the wild, so this patch
should cause no problems.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Over two years ago, the Linux USB developers stated that they believed
there was no way to create a USB kernel driver that was not under the GPL.
This patch moves the USB apis to enforce that decision.

The USB subsystem has changed a lot over time, and it has been possible
to create userspace USB drivers using usbfs/libusb/gadgetfs that operate
as fast as the USB bus allows.  Because of this, the USB subsystem will
not be allowing closed source kernel drivers to register with it, after
this grace period is over.  If anyone needs any help in converting their
closed source drivers over to use the userspace filesystems, please
contact the linux-usb-<email removed> mailing list, and the developers
there will be glad to help you out. Greg Kroah-Hartman


linux kernel

linux drivers

usb vendor id (VID), product ID

python usb module

libusb library

fprint library depends on libusb

  • http://www.reactivated.net/ (‘My fprint efforts lead to me adopting the libusb project. I am working on libusb-1.0 which will offer new features allowing for more powerful applications’)
  • http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/Main_Page (« The fprint project aims to plug a gap in the Linux desktop: support for consumer fingerprint reader devices »)
  • http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/Libfprint

    • Written in C
    • Licensed as LGPL-2.1
    • Depends on libusb for USB communication and glib
    • Primarily developed for linux, but should be fairly portable
    • Offers a single API to application developers to access the entire range of supported devices
    • Supports imaging – downloading live fingerprint scans from the device
    • Includes image processing/matching code
    • Supports enrollment/verification – enrolling a print from a known user, and then later comparing a live scan to the enrolled print

				

Posted in 2010, Années, Drivers, Git, libusb, USB | Tagué: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Quelques nouvelles de python: python 3.1a2 release, switching to mercurial, pycon 2009

Posted by patrick sur avril 5, 2009

Gestion de versions: la gestion des sources de python passe de subversion à mercurial !.

  • http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-python-is-switching-to-mercurial.html (‘Starting at PyCon 2008 thanks to Barry Warsaw and the Bazaar team I started thinking about moving Python over to a distributed version control system (DVCS). While I wanted to get offline commits for the benefit of non-core developers along with easier merging from 2.6 to 3.0 (ah, the days when there are only three branches under development), I knew that would not necessarily be enough of a reason for others to switchBased on the results of that survey where git was clearly the most disliked tool of the core developers, having the weakest Windows support, and not being implemented in Python, I decided to eliminate git from the running and announce its elimination at the first lightning talk at PyCon.When I arrived at PyCon pretty much everyone asked me about the DVCS PEP. People wanted to know how it was going, who was going to win, and giving me support/pity for what I was going through. Guido noticed this and decided to end my misery by saying he wanted to make a decision by the end of PyCon. I said I was fine with that as one was already about to be eliminated and I knew my personal preference at that exact moment aligned with Guido’s…So Monday morning came around and I walked into the sprint. I asked Guido if he was ready to make a decision. He said yes, we both said hg, and so Guido tweeted the decision before telling python-dev that we chose Mercurial…Obviously community preference as shown at PyCon played a role. No one wants to choose a DVCS that causes the community to not want to contribute to Python. And I would never choose a VCS that would cause Guido to not want to work on Python. Some people seem surprised that something non-technical played a role, but ignoring social issues is to ignore how much open source is a social phenomenon. And we are not the first project to take social preference into consideration: I know both GNOME and Pinax chose git because their developers preferred git. And there are technical reasons. Having hg being faster than bzr by 2x to 3x does matter to some extent. No one wants to cause someone to not contribute because they didn’t want to wait for a checkout. And having personally experienced long checkout times because of a subpar connection to a specific server I know this can occur. The performance margin between hg and bzr is within reason typically and is not a flat-out deal-breaker, but it doesn’t help either. Bazaar also has its short timespan of format stability working against it. The tool has changed its format at least three times based on what the man page says (1.0, 1.6, and 1.9). Mercurial, on the other hand, has been stable since I think it went public or near that time. They take great pride in the fact they have not changed it. And that stability more aligns with python-dev’s sensibilities regarding stability. Once again the Python community stands out as being friendly and understanding about stuff like this with no one really seeming to be upset that we made the decision we did.’)
  • http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087931.html (‘Dear Python developers,The decision is made! I’ve selected a DVCS to use for Python. We’re switching to Mercurial (Hg). The implementation and schedule is still up in the air — I am hoping that we can switch before the summer.’)

A voir

Pycon 2009

  • http://pycon.blogspot.com/2009/04/all-pycon-2009-videos-uploading.html (‘The video team has pulled the trigger and all the video from the conference is being uploaded now. At the time of this post about 14 talks are now online. By the end of the day Friday, almost everything should be available (with a few minor exceptions). The videos are also integrated into the PyCon Schedule App as well, with a minor lag time. Just look for the tiny video icon: .
    Congratulations to the entire PyCon US 2009 volunteer video team for performing this Herculean task. In total 2.2TB of video, covering 168 hours of material, were collected, edited, transcoded, and uploaded. This is divided into 96 hours from the tutorials and 72 hours from the main conference
    .’)

A voir

Python 3.1a2 release

Posted in 2009, bazaar, Gestion de version, Git, mercurial | Tagué: , , , , | Leave a Comment »